Henry James The Art of Fiction Essay -- Henry James The Art of Fictio

Henry James The guile of FictionIn an essay written in response to an essay written by Walter Besant, both titled The Art of Fiction, Henry James provides both a new understanding of fiction and greater understand of his own works. James analyses, however briefly, the process of humanity of a work of fiction, readers responses to it, and the requirements of the work and the author. James language within this essay may be in need of some levity, but he does occasionally sort out through the haze to make a very strong and effective point The only condition that I can think of attaching to the composition of a novel isthat it be sincere (161)There is point in which over-analysis takes away from the intention, the point in which talk of theory wanders away from the actual work of art. This is as true today in the critique of fiction as it was in James time. In analysis we often place requirements of a piece of work. We state that for something to be this, it must then have that. These restrictions and guidelines can hardly be placed on fiction. We cannot presuppose the c...

Technology Law :: Law College Admissions Essays

After a few quick gulps of coffee, I done for(p) from my apartment in Florida. It was six in the morning and still dark outside. Seventeen hours later, I made it to the District of Columbia. I drove to Washington to date a conference hosted by Ralph Nader on the state of competition in the computer industry. At some point during that drive, I realized I had obtain a computer nerd.   Before that, I had never really fancied myself a computer nerd. To be quit honest, computers used to intimidate me in a certain respect. I did not even own one until I enrolled in college. My primary interest in college was philosophical system, a discipline which, at starting glance at least, does not seem particularly connected to the computer being. I was drawn to philosophy because of its emphasis on analytic thinking. By analytical thinking, I mean the use of logical analysis and creative speculation to sort out different aspects of an argument. I instantly felt at main office in my first philosophy class when my professor remarked that people looking for the answers in his classes would be disappointed. What interested me in philosophy was the sustained and rigorous tone-beginning to think through intellectual questions not necessarily to the answers, but towards more sophisticated formulations of alternative viewpoints and arguments.   In contrast to my intuitive attraction to philosophy, I stumbled upon the world of computers in my junior year of college. Tired of working unrewarding jobs during the summer, I figured that I should develop some practical, marketable skills (especially since graduation was nearing and I knew my philosophy degree, while invaluable to me, was not a hot commodity on the job market). In that context, I took a few computer programming classes. I soon discovered that I actually liked designing programs. Whereas I assumed that the answers would be taken for granted in computer science, I bring that computer science, especially when practically applied, requires both logical and imaginative problem solving. The skills refined in my philosophy classes, the application of logical thinking and attention to mixed ways of looking at a problem, proved helpful in computer programming.   Later, I sensed other links between my interest in philosophy and the technical world of computers. I first began making those realizations while working for Stand For Children, a small Washington DC based nonprofit. Stands armorial bearing is to develop a national network of child activists.